For the last 60 years, executives have lived with assessment methodologies that measure what’s measurable, rather than what they truly want to know. Traits, personalities, probabilities, “types” and concepts create obscure, fuzzy categories of information. Those tools can’t measure and predict the specific ways of how people will do their work. That’s frustrating for executives whose primary goal is to know, in advance, how people will perform in a job.
However, our 40 years of research has changed the measurement game. And, our 30 years of real-life success in Fortune 500 companies has confirmed its value.
The Sommer Survey represents the next generation and new breed of assessment tools. Through a thoroughly researched and battle-tested methodology, it uses the only known method to uncover both the conscious and unconscious components of thinking and decision strategies - deep linguistic analysis. The result is highly relevant, predictable and actionable insight previously not possible. It provides direct linkage to performance prescriptions that leverage performance on-the-job.
We acknowledge that traditional assessment approaches play a familiar role. But those approaches, by their inherent man-made design, find only fragments of the desired decision profile because critical elements and their relationships “slip through the cracks”.
Only The Sommer Survey obtains, in a totally natural manner, the entire and actual thinking decision strategy used on the job in specific, real-time situations. Learn what’s now possible - try the Sommer Survey for FREE on a few candidates or executives - and you will be amazed.
Critical Criteria |
The Sommer Predictive Survey |
Personality Profiles |
360° Feedback Assessments |
Cognitive & Critical Thinking Assessments |
Behavioral Assessments & Observation |
Based On A Validated Science |
Yes |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
Relevant For Assessment & Selection |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Relevant For Coaching, Team Building & Development |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Naturally Identifies What Really Matters vs. Interpreting Man-Made Categories That “Might” Matter |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Predicts What Someone “Will Do”, vs. Describing Theoretical Traits & Correlations |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Able To Specifically Track How An Employee Shifts Over Time To Different Jobs |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Measures Direct Cause-Effect Links Between Decision Strategies & Job Performance |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Identifies Relevant Decision Making Mechanisms Via A Predictive Job Simulation |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Identifies All Conscious & Unconscious On-The-Job Thinking & Decision Features |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Identifies Specific Differences Between Top Performers And Average Or Low Performers |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Measures How Changing External Variables (e.g., Corporate Policy, Structure, Training, M&A, etc.) Impact Mindsets |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Provides Specific Prescriptive Interventions To Change Behavior And Improve Performance |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |